We still have openings or pre-order your copy for download.
We’ve revised our webinar on GedMatch and DNAPainter and will be offering it again on 30 June. Attend live or pre-order a copy of the presentation on our announcement page.

We still have openings or pre-order your copy for download.
We’ve revised our webinar on GedMatch and DNAPainter and will be offering it again on 30 June. Attend live or pre-order a copy of the presentation on our announcement page.
Family historians sometimes ask relatives questions at holiday get togethers. Here are some you might want to think twice before asking.
A genealogy colleague sent me back these (she wishes to remain anonymous):
Feel free to post additional suggestions. If they are clean, we’ll add them. If they are not, well…
It can be tempting to assume that “my people won’t be in the newspaper” as they never did anything worthy of note and they “weren’t in the right class of people” to be in the paper. That can be a mistake. This rural Virginia family lost their farm to the state because their father’s will was never recorded and he was never married to their mother. They eventually had to petition the state to get the title cleared up.
It’s always worth a look. Assuming they are not in the paper can be a mistake.
Ideally before you go on a genealogy research trip, you’ve made a list of the records you want to search, where they are located, etc. The reality is that many people don’t do that.
One thing you don’t want to neglect to do: check the hours of the facilities you will visit, determine their access policies, see what cameras and scanners are allowed, etc.
It can be a waste of time if the facility is not open when you “guessed” it would be, if records are off-site for one reason or another, or if you can only take a pencil and paper into the records area. These are things you need to know before you ever think about heading to perform on-site research a distance from your home.
I’ve been looking at a few sample images from the new book,
Family Tree Historical Atlas of Germany by James Beidler and I was reminded of a few things about maps–other than their general importance in genealogical research which goes without saying:
Record the provenance of any family items in your possession? Do you know who the original owner was? Do you know anything about how or when the item was made? How did it come into your possession? Who else owned it?
Scratching the information into the back of the piece isn’t necessary–although if it’s already been done for you, it’s too late. And…it does add to the character of the piece and your connection to it.
Online indexes can lead you to an image of a record with a quick search–if you are lucky enough that names are spelled and indexed correctly. Make certain the “next image” isn’t part of the item you located. Census records may be split over two pages, draft cards are often images of the front and back of the card, death certificates sometimes contain “supplements” directly after the original document.
Always look at the next image or two in any online set of images to make certain you’ve got it all–and look forward too as well.
You’ll never know until you look.
It can be tempting to see one “juicy” clue in a document and want to run with it and begin researching it as soon as possible. It can be tempting to see a relative’s name in a document and conclude that the record has to be on him. It can be easy to misinterpret a word, get that incorrect meaning stuck in your head, and create a brick wall where none existed.
Read the entire document that you’ve located. Think about what it says. Think about what it does not say. What does that document really imply? What does it not imply? Is there something you are hoping to see in that document that is not there?
It may seem like needless advice, but you might be surprised how easy it can be to read part of a document or file and jump off on further research when that unread portion either conflicts what you have read or provides additional detail to make further research easier.
Throughout much of American history (and in other countries as well), adoption was an informal process where court or legal action was not required. Your relative may have been adopted without any legal record of that adoption taking place. The child may have been apprenticed out to a neighbor to learn a trade (sometimes generating a legal record–but not always). If the child’s parents were deceased, but had some property, there may have been a guardian appointed to oversee the property while the child was underage. In many other cases the child was simply “taken in” or perhaps spent time with a variety of families–not all of whom may have been related.
As time moves forward, formal adoptions become more common, but those records are often sealed by court order and access to those records is dependent upon state statute.
But if your ancestor was adopted in the United States in 1880, the chance of finding a record is slim. Possible, but not too likely.
Accurate spelling of place names is one way I quickly determine if the compiler of genealogical information (online tree, book, etc.) pays attention to details. Of course, the occasional typo is one thing (which can easily be avoided in most programs by the way), but if the database I find has some of these spellings:
then I am a little worried about the rest of the data. Call me persnickity, but genealogy is about details. If place names that are established and standard (as these are) are not spelled correctly, how certain can I be that names, dates, and relationships are entered in the way they should be? We should always double check any compiled information–correct spellings don’t mean that the data is correct. It just means that the compiler checked the spelling. From a probability standpoint, trees with spelling errors are more prone to have other errors. It’s simply about the numbers and if I have many compilations on a family to use as a starting point, I’ll start with one that’s not full of spelling errors.
It’s possible that someone simply chose the wrong spelling once and never noticed it–that happens. I also don’t write people nasty notes to correct their spelling. I use the correct one in any communication and leave it at that.
I’m not talking about someone trying to read the name of a German town on a nearly illegible death certificate–that’s something different altogether.