A big thanks to those who have supported Genealogy Tip of the Day since our inception
The guy behind Genealogy Tip of the Day, his mother, and his stuffed toy, Christmas of 1970.
several years ago.
I appreciate those who take the time to comment, either here, our Facebook Fan Page, or our Facebook group. Our intent is always to share research ideas in short, quick, to-the-point posts, saving the longer items for my other blogs.
A person learns when doing genealogical research that there is a great deal they do not know even after they’ve researched for some time. A few things I’ve learned include:
- there are exceptions to just about every rule
- it’s important to admit our assumptions, deal with them, and get beyond them
- writing greatly improves your genealogical research
- you help people more by showing them how instead of telling them “your way is wrong”
- more people appreciate my sense of humor than I thought
I always appreciate the comments and ideas readers send. I can’t always incorporate them, but I do read them.
And in case anyone wonders, Genealogy Tip of the Day is a one-man operation. There is no staff and no assistant.
Even that teddy bear in the picture won’t help out.
Thanks for reading and thanks for being a part of Genealogy Tip of the Day.
If your Civil War veteran relative was receiving a Union pension in January of 1898, he should have been sent this questionnaire asking about his marital status, previous wives, and children. There may be dates of death or marriage on that sheet that are not available elsewhere, especially in locations that don’t keep vital records. The illustration is from a Missouri veteran’s file and gives the name and death date for the veteran’s previous wife. Another sheet was needed to give the names and dates of birth for all his children. Civil War pensions for Union veterans are at the National Archives in Washington, DC.
In some cases this may be information you already have. In others, it could be a real help.
Genealogy Tip of the Day is proudly sponsored by GenealogyBank. In February, they are offering an annual subscription for a monthly rate equivalent to less than $5 a month!
We appreciate the sponsorship of GenealogyBank. Unlike some sponsors, they exercise no editorial control over our content–which we appreciate too.
I still have room on my research trips coming up later this year. If you’ve been thinking of making a trip to the Family History Library in Salt Lake or the Allen County Public Library in Ft. Wayne, Indiana, consider joining us:
While reading Staking Her Claim: Women Homesteading the West, by Marcia Meredith Hensley, I came across a reference to a woman referring to a single neighbor man as a “grass widow” in a letter written by Julia Erickson in Winnett, Montana, in 1911 (page 111).
Doing a little research, I discovered that men could be referred to as “grass widowers” just in the same way as women could be referred to as “grass widows.” The reason was the same: the spouse was “gone.” Of course, gone can mean quite a few things from temporarily away, to separated, to divorced.
But use of the adjective “grass” was not limited to women. It could apply to men as well.
No matter how hard you try, sometimes it is difficult to get good picture of a tombstone. Do not rely only on your photograph if the stone appears difficult to read at the cemetery. Make a transcription there at the cemetery while you are on site. Draw a sketch of the stone if necessary and write the transcription on your sketch of the stone. Take a picture of that hand made drawing and transcription to have with your actual stone photograph. You may be happy you did when you get home.
Or you may find out how many swear words one picture causes you to make when you can’t see the transcription in the photograph.
There is a link to managing your email subscription on the top of every blog page. If you are unable to unsubscribe using the links, please send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org letting me know which list you need to be removed from. Thanks.
I maintain the following genealogy blogs:
Be careful drawing conclusions from an ancestor “making their mark.” It means that they made their mark. Sometimes the person signing a document:
- was told to make his mark even if he could write
- chose to make his mark even though he could write
- was physically unable to sign his name and making his mark was all he could do even though in years past he could write his name
- made a mark because that was all he knew how to do even though he was in fine health
Be wary of drawing conclusions on your ancestor literacy based upon the presence or absence of one signature.
If a record gives a person’s age, remember:
- The age could easily be off by one year or more.
- if accurate, don’t just subtract the age given in the record from the year of the record. Someone aged 35 in 1870 could have been born in 1835. Or, if they turned 36 the next day and the year was still 1870, they were actually born in 1834.
Concluding the age is accurate is always something to be done with good reason. I always use a year of birth calculated from an age in a record as an approximation of that year.
The first clue I had that one of my ancestors might have been married more than once was when two of her heirs were not listed as heirs of her husband. The husband died a year later and if they shared all the same children, their heirs should have been the same. The two heirs of hers that were not his were still living when he died.
It turned out those two were her children by a previous husband.