Fudging One Piece of Information Is All It Sometimes Takes

Census enumerators are sometimes given a slightly incorrect detail or two to make a family situation appear different than it is. In this 1930 enumeration the husband’s “age at first marriage” is incorrect–probably to make it look like he was the father of all the children. The oldest child was the wife’s by a previous marriage.

There is not really anything in this enumeration to suggest that either–the gap in ages of children could easily be explained by an infant death, miscarriage, etc. This is why looking at more than one record is imperative.


2 thoughts on “Fudging One Piece of Information Is All It Sometimes Takes

  1. Nina M Reauveau

    Or… it could be that the husband or whomever was asked the question about their age at ‘first’ marriage took the question quite literally and gave the age they were when they married for the first time and not necessarily representing their current marriage.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.