My DNA analysis would be easier if: My grandfather’s first cousin was not also his second cousin and his third cousin. It can happen. When I was related to A and B and A and B are related to each other, it meant that A, B, and I shared a common ancestor. It does not. I had no duplicate ancestors closer than 5th great-grandparents. Multiple relationships can complicate DNA match analysis. Always ask yourself “are there additional biological relationships that I could be missing?” and ” is there another reasonable scenario that fits this information?” Those whose ancestors lived in urban settings are less likely to have this problem that those who lived in rural areas. Individuals whose ancestors married within their community–whether that was cultural, religious, economic, […]
John died in Illinois in 1869 with no descendants. When his estate was finally settled up a few years later, his brother Robert’s family split Robert’s share of John’s estate. Robert’s three heirs split Robert’s share equally. One might assume that those three heirs were Robert’s children. They were not. One of those heirs was Robert’s wife and the other two were Robert’s children. Robert was alive when John died, but died before John’s estate was finally settled. Had Robert been dead when John died, Robert’s two children would have split Robert’s share between just the two of them–even if Robert’s wife were alive at the time. All based on how intestate inheritance worked in Illinois in the 1870s.
This tip is not about how typewriters work or whether a correction tape was used. Instead it is about how something got in a typed record, certificate, etc. Did someone orally give the information directly as the form was typed? Was the information misheard? Did someone write down the information in an abbreviated manner only to complete the form on a typewriter later? Is it possible that their notes were difficult to read? A reader mentioned recently that “Oh” and “Ok” may look very similar depending on the handwriting. They are very different place and one could very easily be misinterpreted for the other. The typed out form could be hiding how the information came to be in that typed record. And the “how” matters and could explain […]
I’ve mentioned this tip before, but it’s one that is good to remember. What records or sources could directly state or indirectly suggest the event or relationship I would like to document? There may not be a birth record, but there may be other records that state the date and place of birth or that state the parent-child relationship. The same is true for a marriage. There may be records that document the marriage, but are not actually marriage records. A birth may be documented on a death certificate, a marriage record, an estate settlement or other documents. The same is true of a marriage. Of course those records may provide statements that are not primary information. That analysis is just a part of the research process. It […]
A relative was born in 1910 in Oklahoma. While she had no birth certificate, her parents are enumerated in the 1910 census as a young couple a few months before her birth. The family can be found in every decennial census record–where her place of birth is listed as Oklahoma. Everything is consistent, except for her 1980s death certificate in California which indicated she was born in Ohio. Of course the document is transcribed exactly as it is written and correcting it is out of the question–it is impractical, not material to her death, and likely to be met with derision from the records office. The bigger question for me is “how?” How did the place of birth get listed so incorrectly? Death certificates for individuals who died […]
Online “trees” can easily contain an error no matter how conscientious the compiler is. The number of errors can be significantly higher if the compiler is more interested in how many names they obtain or how fast they can compile information instead of how accurate it is. Those errors can be frustrating to someone who finds them–particularly if they involve individuals the finder of the error knew personally. It can be maddening to see that someone has your grandparent with an incorrect spouse, a wrong place of birth, or a parentage that is completely erroneous. These errors can proliferate wildly if other individuals simply copy them into their tree. The first thing a person should do is make certain that their information is correct. Sometimes this a quick […]
If your relative has property values in the 1850 and 1860 census, analyze them in context–not in isolation. The only thing the value tells you by itself is that the relative owned property. Context matters. How does their property value compare to that of their neighbors in both these enumerations? By what percentage does their property value change from one enumeration to the next? Does this same change seem to be taking place with their neighbors as well? An increase in property value could mean more property was acquired, property values in that area went up in general, or improvements were made on the property. A decrease may mean property values declined or property was sold. No matter the value of real property listed in the census, locate […]
The title of this post may conjure up memories of a college roommate you have not seen in years. It’s about those relationships given in documents or records that can be interpreted in one of many ways. Sister-in-law or brother-in-law are two of those relationships. I have a sister-in-law who is my brother’s wife and another sister-in-law who is my wife’s sister. Had my wife’s brother married, his wife would also have been my sister-in-law. Keep in mind that for some relationships, “in-law” or “step” may never be used when describing the relationship. Individuals may be referred to as “nephews” whether they are biological or related by marriage. And of course the difference matters to a genealogist and when analyzing DNA matches or those individuals who “fail to […]
Success with the DNA aspect of your genealogical research will be enhanced if more relatives are also tested. It can sometimes be difficult to get other family members to test and it is best to take a “soft and gentle” approach when trying to convince others to test. Prioritizing those you should ask and those you should test is also important. Generally speaking it is older family members and ones who might not be around as long as you would like. Another factor to consider is how many generations the testee is from the ancestor on whom you are really stuck. If your great-great-grandparents are the problem and your parents and their siblings are deceased, do those great-great-grandparents have any great-grandchildren who are still living? They may even […]
There are times when the methodology of tracking all the friends, associates, and neighbors can be taken a bit too far. It’s always important to keep perspective in mind and to think about interactions with people in our own lives when researching those whose lifespan preceded our own. The witness who appears on several deeds my ancestor signed? That’s someone I probably should research a little further to determine what (if any) the connection is to my ancestor. The lawyer who draws up his last will and testament or writes a few deeds for him? That’s someone whose background I should research, but I probably would not research the lawyer as closely as the repeating witness. Think about your own documents and records and how people from your […]
One problem-solving approach I like to use is to constantly ask myself “what could I be missing?” That’s an intentionally broad question and does cover a lot of ground. Do I really have every document on this person? Is there a relative I’ve overlooked? Is there a detail I do not understand in this record? Did I get everything in the file or record? Is there something I think I understand that I do not? And so it goes.
Give yourself or that genealogist on your holiday list the gift of Genealogy Tip of the Day in book form. We’re offering copies of Genealogy Tip of the Day our book of early tips for $17. This offer is only available while our supply lasts. Shipping is included. This is $5 less than the Amazon Prime price and an even better deal if shipping is taken into account. For more detail about the book, visit this page. To order at the Black Friday weekend discount, use this link. This link is not available anywhere else but this post. If the order page does not come up it means our supply at this price has been exhausted.
There is no doubt that in local records throughout much of American history women do not appear as often as men. Genealogists know that an American women who dies before the twentieth century is more likely to have an estate settlement if her husband died before her. But it is a mistake to assume that a woman would never appear in a court or land record in the United States before the twentieth century. While divorce was less common, it did happen. There were women who, for one reason or another, had separate property and occasionally appeared in a court record or a land record because of it. Failing to search for that female relative in court and land records “because I have not found one yet,” means […]
An ancestor of mine has children who were born in Canada, Michigan, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska. He and his family got around. Never assume that your ancestor did not move. Just because he was in a specific location in 1850 and 1860 does not mean that he was there in 1855. One of my wife’s ancestral families was in Illinois in every census after 1860, but spent two years in Pennsylvania and a year in England after that. Both of these residences took place in off census years and the family was “back” in Illinois for the next enumeration. Some city and town dwellers who rented their home may have moved frequently as well. They may have stayed in the same general neighborhood or maybe not. The […]
Tracking down those aunts and uncles who had no descendants is advised because it helps give the researcher a complete picture of the entire family and it helps all members of the family to be remembered. Those are excellent reasons. But there’s another reason. Some record on that relative with no children of their own could provide information on those relatives you can’t find out more about. This 1980 death certificate for my aunt listed a sister-in-law as the informant–complete with residential address in 1980. Had I been unable to track her down, the reference would have been extremely helpful. Any record on that relative with no descendants could tell you more about your relative’s life. It could also provide information on other family members as well. The […]
Recent Comments