A distant relative indicated that a naturalizing ancestor was the apprentice of his father-in-law in the 1850s. I was unaware of the apprentice relationship and asked her how she knew. She said that the father-in-law had been a witness on the naturalizing ancestor’s naturalization. The father-in-law was vouching for his age, character, etc. when he naturalized. My correspondent indicated that the witnessing meant there was an apprentice relationship between the two. I gently asked where she had learned this. I never heard back. The witness on a naturalization is testifying to what’s stated on the document: generally that the person needed to be naturalized, was of legal age (sound mind, etc.), and of good character. The witness needed to be a citizen themselves of legal age. That’s it. […]
These comments generally apply to US research on those individuals who were sent to a state “asylum” for the “insane.” Keep in mind that the general meaning of that last word has changed over time. Access to state hospital records is normally set by state statute–so if a court order is required, it’s required and the process in one state may be different that the process in another state. Records of the committal are typically county court records and those may be open–you just need to find out what court handles those sorts of cases during the time period in question. In some areas, they may be town records. There may also be references to the case in the newspaper–not as likely, but possible depending upon the situation. […]
Several years ago I worked through a set of DNA matches and reached a conclusion about the paternal grandmother of the testee. I felt strongly that my reasoning and conclusion were correct. As more matches have come in for this test, they have all been consistent with that original conclusion. That’s not the problem. I never wrote up my analysis and recently a correspondent, new to genealogy and from a different part of the family, asked me about the testee’s relationship to the paternal grandmother. The correspondent very nicely asked me “how I reached my conclusion.” She wasn’t doubting it, she just wanted to know how–partly so she could see if my conclusion was correct and also I think to help her with another part of her own […]
The 19th and early 20th definition of “insane” differs from how the word is used today. Great-grandma’s admission to the “insane asylum,” may have meant that family members were simply unable to care for her at home any longer for one reason or another. Having her admitted to the county or state home or hospital may have been the family’s only option given her situation and theirs. Records of these committals are local records–usually county court records, but that can vary from one location to another. There may have been a separate court to hear these cases, sometimes called an “insanity court,” or they may be filed with other court records. The person being committed/admitted is typically the defendant in these cases. The records of these committals, if […]
The Family History Library’s website has many online indexes to digital images of records. But there are more images on FamilySearch that are unindexed and online–essentially rolls of microfilm that can be viewed digitally. The best way to find these items is to search the card catalog for the town/village, county, and state of interest and then browse through the items. Do not forget to search the catalog for all political jurisdictions into which your area of interest falls. The catalog can be searched at: https://www.familysearch.org/search/catalog
It’s often the case that we don’t know as much as we think we do. Research is best done to find everything there could be instead of confirming what we think we know. Family tradition indicated that a relative and her husband had three children. No mention was made of other children and their obituaries both indicated that they had four children. A search of birth records for the entire duration of their marriage located a first child who died shortly after birth. No mention was ever made of this first child. Such situations were not uncommon. Many families, for one understandable reason or another, did not mention children that died at birth or shortly after birth. These individuals can easily be overlooked if we only look for […]
I’ve Found It: Now What? Already held. This presentation discusses what do to when you’ve located that elusive document. The bulk of the presentation will include ways to get the “most” of the document, making certain to interpret it in the historical, legal and other contexts. Also included will be a discussion of the problem-solving process, organizing research plans, and organizing what’s confusing. The presentation will wrap up with a discussion of how to create further research plans based upon what has been located. This is over. The recording and handout can be ordered for immediate download.
Never assume that your ancestor went directly from point A to point B. Finances, broken wagons, unexpected opportunities, illnesses (as in the example) or other reasons may have caused your ancestor to pause somewhere along the way. This pause may have been for a short time or longer–it’s seven years for the family who stopped due to a measles outbreak in 1813. A variety of events along the trip may have drained your ancestor’s finances and necessitated a longer stay along the way than intended. And sometimes those stays generate records.
If you are wanting to do something “genealogical,” but are extremely frustrated and need a break from actual research, consider doing one of the following: organize your files, go through photos you have not identified, write about your childhood (or any part of your life), write what you remember about deceased relatives, take an object from your history (anything in good taste will do) and write about it, take a break–there are dishes to do, clothes to wash, etc.
No one signed this 1968 postcard sent to my great-grandfather in 1968. Given the salutation of “Dear Dad,” it was obviously written by one of his seven children. This tip isn’t about determining which child wrote their Dad a postcard in 1968 and mailed it from Wyoming (some handwriting comparison will have to be done, if samples can be found). It’s about those documents and records that often have pieces of information that we think are missing. The reality of it is that sometimes those “missing” details, while not stated in the item, were clearly known to the individuals at the time. M. J. Habben likely knew which of his children was travelling out west in the summer of 1968. He may even have known their handwriting as […]
For any ancestor presenting you with research challenges, can you think of five ancestral associates–people your ancestor interacted with in a significant fashion–other than blood relatives? Associates could be geographic neighbors, sponsors of children, witnesses on a record, etc.
My webinar on “Beginning German Genealogy” has been released. Information has been sent to those who pre-ordered copies–email me if you did not receive your download link. We are offering a 25% discount on orders through 4 October. Details on our announcement page.
Many census records used by American genealogists are actually handwritten “cleaned up” copies of the census taker’s field notes. Those copies were the ones that were microfilmed and eventually digitized. There’s always the chance for error. A copy of will in a will record is a handwritten copy of the will. It’s not the original will itself–even though a record copy is the legal equivalent. A copy of a deed in a deed record book is usually a handwritten copy of the actual deed–if recorded before photoduplication was an option. Is that entry for a relative in a marriage register the “original” or is it a transcribed copy of what was in the marriage record? The same thing applies to an entry in a death register. Was it […]
Recent Comments