From now through 1:00 a.m. 29 July 2015, a subscription to 52 issues of Casefile Clues is only $17. Your subscription can be processed here. Easy to understand, well-written, and genealogically sound, see records discussed and “next steps” planned out. We have updated our list of back issue topics here.
If an ancestor marries on 1 December 1901 and it is indicated that he was “of legal age,” on that date, then (if 21 is the legal age to marry) he was alive by 1 December 1880. Marrying, buying property, naturalizing, and other “legal acts” require a person to be of age even if their age is not stated in the document. Of course people will lie about their age, but that’s a separate tip.
Every week, I send out a blog update with a summary of postings to all my blogs, links to those postings, and some extra content not found on the blog, including: photo scan with documentation document citation example “does it really say that?” Handwriting sample Letter of the week The blog update (view the latest one here) is only $5 a year delivered directly to your email and helps us cover various web hosting and other costs. It is separate from Casefile Clues which is much more detailed and in-depth.
A name that sounds unusual to you may not be uncommon at all in the area where your relative is from. Early in my research, I believed that someone with the same last name as my grandmother (Habben) “had” to be related. Turns out they didn’t. In the area where her family was from the last name was more common than I thought and just because two people shared that last name did not mean they had to be related.
There might have been more to your ancestor’s migration on the frontier than heading to new opportunities, cheaper land, and fewer nearby neighbors. Is it possible that your ancestor was migrating along with other members of the same denomination?
When something in a record doesn’t make sense consider that the item that’s confusing you is: weird–some things are truly unusual for the time period and location. This is determined by learning about the time period and location in which your relative lived and in which the record was created. Things that are truly weird are clues. not weird–just because you think something is weird does not mean that it is. Again some contextual knowledge will assist in discovering what’s not really weird. wired–you simply have had too much caffeine, too little sleep, and are jumping to unwarranted conclusions. Researching and making conclusions when you are “wired” does not lead to sound research. Get some rest.
Keep in mind that any age given in a census could easily be off by a year or more. Use these ages as guides that could be slightly off
[reposted from November 2014 as it didn’t migrate over] Before you post a genealogy query online, think about how easy you are making it for someone else to help you. Ideal queries provide a summary of what you know. Potential helpers may be less likely to help if they have to post a series of follow up questions to really know what you know and what you don’t. For a list of query writing suggestions, check out this post on Rootdig.
It’s easy to say “yes…I always am aware of my assumptions.” It’s more difficult sometimes to really be aware of what they are. All researchers bring their own background to their genealogical research table. That background effects our assumptions that we make. One way to catch assumptions is to ask yourself, “how is this situation different from others I’ve researched?” Am I “comparing apples to oranges,” “are there things about this ‘new’ area of which I am really unaware?” One challenge I have in this regard is that my upbringing is rural and my ancestors were rural. I grew up in a county where many people were related to each other, many of our parents attended school together, many of our grandparents attended school together. The county had no stoplight […]
Read carefully. These two names look similar, but they are different: Thomas Frame and Thomas Francis. One is the naturalizing individual and the other is his witness. Don’t always assume the clerk made a mistake.
After a hiatus, we are ready to resume distribution of Casefile Clues. You can get free copies following the directions below 2 free copies of Casefile Clues can be yours-simply enter in your email address and “submit” order. There is no credit card or other personal information required. Copy 1 Copy 2 We are looking forward to returning to our research, analysis and discussion of records. And, yes, we are even looking forward to returning to citations. We’ve got stories on some old favorites, follow ups to a few missing links, and new families and locations to discuss. We are excited about what’s coming up in the newsletter. An email about the newsletter was supposed to be sent earlier to all subscribers, but apparently it did not go out. All subscribers will […]
When writing an article about Arvin Butler and Jacob Baker, I kept mixing up the last names of Butler and Baker when writing about the two men. The same thing could have happened to an informant on a death certificate or other record. If the last names were similar or if the person just “got them in their head wrong,” a mix up could have been the result.
When reading a document, try and determine if the handwriting was all done by one person or if more than one person might have written on the document. In one record being used recently, it became clear that the specific date on a document was left blank and completed by someone else.
If you are having difficulty analyzing and interpreting a document or don’t feel you “got all the information” from it, make a chronology based on the document. Use every stated and implied date. You might be surprised at what you discover.
I discussed an 1876 naturalization in a post yesterday on Rootdig. A reader noticed that the date of the naturalization was the day before the presidential election. That’s a good point. The proximity of the date should be noted because it makes one wonder if the naturalization processed was hastened in any way. It doesn’t mean the immigrant wasn’t an immigrant or that his place of birth, etc. was incorrect. If anything it could mean that the naturalization process was sped up in order to allow him to vote. Or it could simply mean that he wanted to complete his paperwork before the election and there was nothing shady going on. And thanks to a Rootdig reader for pointing out the proximity of the date of naturalization to the date of […]
Recent Comments